We cannot judge book by its cover, same with person by his face or behavior? I believe that a person has entitled on his or her opinion whether by facts or by religion. My opinion is we can choose our own culture and belief, and entitled to choose what life we can lead according to our feeling. However, I do not particularly think any moral judgments are relatively true to a particular moral code - since I would need to be historically, culturally, religiously and politically aware for all eras (past and present) of all countries to be able to conclude anything once and for all.

Why? There are countless religions with different moral codes and a large number of people who are not influenced by any. And to accept one particular religion as the basis of human morality would not lead to a sophisticated argument for or against any particular theory. My point here is that the belief that moral judgments are universally and objectively true is not an objective belief itself. It is biased, preferring one seemingly most logical conclusion from various given facts to others. My point is that, no matter how “objective” a judgment seems, it is still biased, based on personal preferences and ideologies. Suppose you have a moral disagreement with someone, for example, a disagreement about whether it is okay to live in a society where there’s a lot of races people with different cultures, religions and ideology. In pursuing this, you assume that you are correct about the issue and that your conversation partner is mistaken. You conversation partner assumes that you are making the blunder. In other words, you both assume that only one of you can be correct.. They believe that conflicting moral beliefs can both be true. Morals judgment vary dramatically across time and place. Many societies have also practiced extreme forms of public torture and execution, as was the case in Europe before the 18th century. And there are cultures that engage in painful forms of body modification, such as scarification, genital infibulation, or foot binding – a practice that lasted in China for 1,000 years and involved the deliberate and excruciating crippling of young girls. Variation in attitudes towards violence is paralleled in attitudes towards sex and marriage. Arranged marriage is also common, and some cultures marry off girls while they are still younger. Of course, there are also cross-cultural similarities in morals. No group would last very long if it promoted gratuitous attacks on neighbors or discouraged childrearing. But within these broad constraints, almost anything is possible. Some groups encourage parents to commit selective infanticide, to use corporal punishment on children, or force them into physical labor or sexual slavery. Differences in circumstances do not show that people share values; rather they help to explain why values end up being so different. Morals do not track differences in observation, and there also is no evidence for rational convergence as a result of moral conflicts. We need to consider how morals are learned, children begin to learn values when they are very young, before they can reason effectively. Young children behave in ways that we would never accept in adults: they scream, throw food, take off their clothes in public, hit, scratch, bite, and generally make a ruckus. Moral education begins from the start, as parents correct these antisocial behaviors, and they usually do so by conditioning children’s emotions. Parents threaten physical punishment, they withdraw love, stracize, deprive, and induce vicarious distress. Each of these methods causes the misbehaved child to experience a negative emotion and associate it with the punished behavior. Children also learn by emotional osmosis. They see their parents’ reactions to news broadcasts and storybooks. They hear hours of judgmental gossip about inconsiderate neighbors, unethical coworkers, disloyal friends, and the black sheep in the family. All of this are some of the cultural variations that people live to follow their own custom and traditions and this are all with reason. We perhaps has no right to make judgment because we think we are right. We cannot condemn them by doing things according to their custom and tradition as perhaps they ought to follow so. Whatever things either culture, traditions and religions that is their right and we don’t have any right to judge them and compare each other. Why not give them some respect with their own as I believe human beings are entitled to have what we called RESPECT and we for instance has no right to condemn or morally judge them.